Posts tagged Leader
Prodigal Solutions, a Leader in Performance Based SEO has launched new ‘SEO … – PR Web (press release)
Nov 16th
|
Prodigal Solutions, a Leader in Performance Based SEO has launched new 'SEO …
PR Web (press release) Prodigal Solutions (http://prodigalsolutions.com), a leader in Performance Based SEO has launched SEO Strategy Packages, a new service for online businesses who choose to execute their Search Engine Optimization strategies in-house. … |
View full post on SEO – Google News
Popular SEO Leader Offers Clients A 50% Discount On All SEO Packages In … – San Francisco Chronicle (press release)
Nov 1st
|
Popular SEO Leader Offers Clients A 50% Discount On All SEO Packages In …
San Francisco Chronicle (press release) For 5 years running, ThinkBIGsites.com has been one of the nation's leading SEO authorities and Internet Marketing Co's. ThinkBIG is one of the few companies in this industry that have been able to consistently increase revenues since 2007 by offering … |
View full post on SEO – Google News
Popular SEO Leader Offers Clients A 50% Discount On All SEO Packages In … – PR Web (press release)
Nov 1st
WhaleShark names Hoyt comms leader – PRWeek
Oct 25th
|
WhaleShark names Hoyt comms leader
PRWeek WhaleShark hired Hoyt, as well as Jeff Smith as senior director of SEO, to increase awareness of RetailMeNot.com and WhaleShark's other brands through an increased emphasis on social and earned media. Hi-Tech Marketing and Public Relations Veterans Jeff Smith and Brian Hoyt … |
View full post on SEO – Google News
OpenStack Leader: Open Source Needs to Rethink Its Priorities
Oct 2nd
Philosophically, the open source concept borrows some selected elements from socialism. It upholds a notion of the “common good,” it eschews the appearance of authority or hierarchy, and it often frowns upon capitalizing on one’s own work, insofar as being exclusive. In practice, however, open source projects may look less like Big Brother from 1984 and more like Big Brother from reality TV.
Joshua McKenty’s still-young career is, compared to those of other capitalist executives, surprisingly replete. He’s led development teams for the Netscape browser, and is intimately familiar with Netscape’s successors at Mozilla. His next stroke of luck was with the space program, helping to create and then lead one of the world’s most successful cloud computing projects, NASA Nebula. His work with NASA spawned the open source community’s most successful – and perhaps most important – project in the last few years, the OpenStack cloud operating system – and he sits on that project’s governing body. In-between jobs, he just happened to pioneer an earthquake modeling system for the World Bank.
What McKenty’s learned from a life that may not be one-third of the way over yet, are the lessons you’d expect to tell your grandkids. Now he’s the CEO of Piston Cloud, the first commercial vendor dedicated to OpenStack. Already, he has a boatload of life lessons for the open source development community at large, and he’s not about to wait for grandkids to come along to start sharing them. With a notable degree of eagerness and enthusiasm, Josh McKenty shared his insights with RWW.
Open source vs. customer focus
McKenty’s story begins with Netscape. His time there began with the somewhat confused period late in the company’s existence as a division of AOL. Immediately he learned that “open” comes in many shades and colors.
He calls the late period of Netscape 8 and 9 “probably the most complicated and nuanced open source environment you can imagine. Netscape was released as the Mozilla code base, and so everyone thinks of Firefox being to the benefit of Netscape. But the code is a tri-license that allows Netscape to close it and develop it for proprietary [purposes] afterwards. Then you have the fact that Firefox, which everybody thinks of as being a Mozilla project, was actually a fork of Mozilla by a sole individual that Mozilla then reverse-forked back into their organization and turned into a $300 million-per-year business, which they did not share.”
It’s ownership and licensing schemes such as this, McKenty says, that make personal politics more prominent in open source projects than philosophies and governance models. He believes one of the Google Chrome project’s greatest strengths comes from the insistence by the Chromium development team – to which Google appears to be adhering – that the code base remain “fully open-sourced, in the open.”
It was at about this time when Mozilla began mitigating what the community described as “the tooltip bug” (typically with an amalgam of punctuation attached), and what the organization officially recorded as dozens of related bugs (just one culmination was recorded here).
“It was a bug that was recorded and watched and re-reported and duplicated 460 times over 7 years,” McKenty relates. “And the response from the Mozilla developer community was always the same: ‘If you really cared, you would learn how to code and fix it yourself.’
Joshua McKenty
CEO, Piston Cloud
“It has always been the worst part of many open source projects, but I think Mozilla’s more guilty of it than anyone else: the attitude that the developers tend to develop over time that they are the important users of the product,” the Piston Cloud CEO continues. “And this has never really been true. That’s what’s interesting about most open source software: The developers who are really deeply engaged in building it may have started out solving their own pain. But if they’re really successful, there are usually two or three orders of magnitude more people using it than actually building it. So the disconnect between what it is and what it needs to become, gets larger and larger. This is why the open source projects that really survive in the long term figure out how to build that bridge back to the end user’s requirements. And those are often commercial entities.”
Stage fright
After Netscape, McKenty went on to be a software architect and business developer for Flock, Inc., whose product was a socially-oriented Web browser built on the Mozilla code base. While there, he tells us, “we would hire new developers turn them loose, and say, ‘Every commit that you make is going to be looked at by other people in the world.’ That’s a terrifying experience, especially if you’re a young coder or you’re new to the code base… It has nothing to do with the philosophy of open source. It has to do with a sense of embarrassment or nervousness to have your daily commits be scrutinized by folks that maybe you think of as being more experienced than you.”
McKenty points to the very project he oversees now – OpenStack – as one example where important components are not produced in the open: for example, support for IPv6 contributed by NTT Data of Japan. “[Of] the 260-odd folks who are actively contributing code, as opposed to design features or documentation or localization or whatever else… about a third of them are not building in the open. They all design in the open; that’s the community requirement. But then they go home and they code for a couple of months until they have something that they can show, and then they make a big code drop, and then we attack it.”
Next page: To space and beyond…
Survey Tells New Federal CIO: “No Clear Leader at the Helm”
Sep 27th
When former FCC Managing Director Steven VanRoekel prepared to take the helm as America’s second Chief Information Officer, he told reporters he believed he could apply the lessons he learned as a senior director for Windows Server at Microsoft to the public sector. A new survey wishes VanRoekel good luck with that, but offers him a grim outlook on the perspectives of the federal IT workers whose policies he will help steer.
The survey is entitled, “Over to You, Mr. VanRoekel: A Federal IT Referendum on Change.” Released today by the public sector IT community MeriTalk, it measures responses from some 174 IT professionals. Among them, 64% believe security issues to be among the most significant roadblocks to government adoption of cloud services. Perhaps that’s not a shock, but maybe this will be: Number two on that same list of obstacles, coming in just above budget constraints, was something called “cultural issues.”
What are “cultural issues?” RWW asked MeriTalk spokesperson Whitney Hewson, who responded, “Good question.”

The “cultural issues” choice was left vague, without any examples provided, Hewson told us. But from the surveyors’ interpretation of responses, it was taken to include “the tendency to lean on ‘business as usual’ and agencies being unwilling to collaborate with one another in new ways, ways required for a shift to cloud services,” she said.
Some 71% of respondents were federal government employees, with an additional 7% employed with intelligence-related services including the Dept. of Defense. Five percent of respondents were state and local government IT workers.
Among federal IT workers responding, some 71% believe that federal IT policy has already improved, just in the few weeks since VanRoekel’s predecessor, Vivek Kundra, left office. Respondents told Meritalk by an overwhelming margin (92%) that cloud adoption “is a good idea” for federal IT. But in the wake of increasing security threats in the last year, their departments remain underfunded for the task of fighting them, say 59%.

Who’s ultimately responsible for federal IT security? When asked that blunt question outright, no single department chosen garnered more than 14%, with the White House tying with the Dept. of Homeland Security at the top of the list. Isn’t that a little scary?
“Unfortunately, we believe it’s accurate,” responded MeriTalk’s Hewson. “There is no clear leader at the helm, despite the requirement for government-wide / private agency collaboration. This should be an important priority for Mr. VanRoekel.”
Part of the underfunding problem may be due to a perception of low return on investment. More than a third of respondents said that cloud services would result in a reduction of fewer than 200 data centers in federal government by 2015, with 10% of respondents believing that more data centers would end up coming online anyway. And 26% of respondents believed cloud adoption would save the entire government less than $75 million. That’s with an “m.”
IT workers blame don’t blame a lack of vision on Kundra’s part so much as a lack of strategy. Apparently they’ve had enough vision to fill an encyclopedia. Some 60% of respondents would like for Kundra to have reduced the number of mandates imposed upon them, while 53% would have appreciated a realistic amount of time in which to make those lofty goals attainable.
Some of the respondents’ suggestions for VanRoekel on this front that MeriTalk shared with us included, “Focus on one goal at a time. Data center inventory/consolidation;” “Keep expectations realistic, keep the small guys in mind. Security, security, security” and “Strengthen mobility initiatives within government, highlight best practices, start Federal CTO council.”
View full post on ReadWriteWeb
UK Leader Who Discussed Blocking Social Networks Joins Google Plus
Sep 14th
David Cameron, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, who made comments in the wake of last month’s nation-wide riots about the possibility of blocking participants in civil unrest from using social media, has joined Google’s new social network, Plus. Joining him this morning were +Ed Miliband and +Nick Clegg (as they are referred to on Google’s site), leaders of the Labor and Liberal Democrat party.
Cameron’s remarks about discussing the possibility of blocking social networks at times of unrest were widely criticized as either a balloon being floated for dictatorial contro, an appeasement of angry critics of social networks or simply heavy-handed. Others said it was simply a matter of putting a widely discussed idea on the table. When the city of San Francisco shut off cell phone service in its transit system in order to prevent organizers of a protest against police brutality from using their mobile devices to organize – that made the whole matter feel much more serious.
An hour after joining, Cameron’s account has been officially verified by Google and welcomed to the service by Plus leader Bradley Horowitz. Cameron has made one post, has just under 200 people who have followed him and has a smattering of supportive and hostile comments posted.
A number of the hostile comments focus on Cameron’s comments about shutting off access to social media. UK blogger Paul Sawers wrote a post about the debate several weeks ago that offered more details but was sympathetic to the perspective that Cameron was merely saying the matter ought to be discussed. Presumably critics believe that the matter of shutting off access to new methods of free speech is not something that should ever be on the table for discussion. To be fair, it probably wouldn’t matter how new, cool and important shouting was either, you’d still be hard pressed to shout fire in a crowded theatre.
Cameron’s joining Plus doesn’t feel the same as when George Bush joined Facebook a year ago this Summer but in the form of a Facebook Page. That meant only people who said they “Liked” the page (and sent that message out to the newsfeed of all their friends) could post a comment in response to the controversial ex-President. That felt like a mini-loyalty oath that had to be taken, even though it was just a standard feature of Facebook. It’s usually just a loyalty oath to a corporate brand that’s required to comment on a page.
Below: Who’s that handsome Plusser? It’s Ed Miliband, Leader of the UK Labour Party and owner of another verified Plus account.

Will the UK leaders, or rather their social media handlers, find value in Plussing? Time will tell. It’s a smaller and far less known social network than Facebook or Twitter, but it does offer some things those don’t. It’s not clear that those unique features and feel for the site are going to prove exciting enough for Plus to gain meaningful adoption, though. Politicians on the site may or may not help with that.
Early analysis indicates that Plus may be catching on the fastest in Asia and Latin America, not in the US or the UK.
Disclosure: Google Plus has included the author in its Suggested User List for new accounts to follow. While that’s an honor, it should be noted that it also confers potentially significant benefits to me and could influence my judgement in discussing the service.
View full post on ReadWriteWeb
Former Apple HTML5 Leader Builds His Own Apps Platform
Sep 2nd
His brainchild is SproutCore, a JavaScript library whose goal is to accelerate HTML5 apps on multiple platforms, including tablets, so their execution speed approaches that of native apps. Charles Jolley began work on SproutCore at Apple, and was a key architect for Apple’s vision of HTML5: a standards-driven effort that could yet be maneuvered to showcase Apple’s strengths.
But one of that effort’s first culminations was MobileMe, Apple’s first attempt at a data-syncing service for Mac and iPod/iPhone customers. That effort became synonymous with “disaster,” one which then-CEO Steve Jobs promised to rebuild. Not very good with failures, Apple let MobileMe languish, and its HTML5 message was dialed down. Rumors such as a reconceiving of the iWork platform diminished, and eventually Jolley left Apple, taking SproutCore with him.
The list of people who have left Apple to do something successful is very, very short – after Steve Jobs himself, the names aren’t very recognizable. Charles Jolley intends to change that in a very big way. His new company, Strobe, has completed development of an HTML5 apps delivery platform, the kind of nerve center for devices like the iPad that Apple would never have signed off on, because it caters also to devices unlike the iPad.
“One of the big reasons I left [Apple] is because I really believe that the next great app ecosystem for mobile especially, but also for PCs and television, is going to be built around HTML5,” Jolley tells RWW. “If you look at the people who are building mobile apps today, 70% of those people will say they want to use HTML5. But a lot of them don’t make it to market, except for a few large companies like Amazon and Financial Times, most people aren’t able to deliver HTML5 apps.”
The Apple platform for apps delivery is rich and compelling, Jolley points out. Unlike an ordinary “open” platform that, almost by definition now, is all self-service, Apple provides direct, personal business services to help developers organize themselves and get on their feet, even if their employer is already recognized around the world. Then Apple provides hosting and deployment services, managing user entitlements and licenses. It creates an ecosystem and then nourishes the entities that live within it, and that’s why Apple’s platform works as well as it does.
“Apple makes it very, very easy for someone to build an app and take it to market. You have these small groups of one or two people who can create businesses around them. And today with HTML5, that’s simply not possible,” says Jolley. “Even though there’s a huge benefit to HTML5 – you can be in any app store, you can go direct to the consumers, you can build any kind of business model you want – if you’re going to reach all the 1.2 billion people out there who are going to be running smartphones in the next few years, you have to be able to reach all of them and have the ability to control your own business. HTML5 is the key for that, but it’s going to have to be as easy to take a product to market and build a business around it as it is for native apps today.”

Currently in active beta, Strobe’s one principal example for iPad comes from NPR, whose approach is designed to mirror the native NPR app available from Apple’s App Store.. Today, Strobe’s Add-on Marketplace – its gallery of HTML5 tools for browsers – is only open to select developers by invitation. Heeding some of the lessons of MobileMe, Strobe intends to work the bugs out of the system before setting its milestone dates in stone. Those dates will not be determined by the release of other products in tandem, as was the case with MobileMe and iPhone 3G.

There is a self-service aspect to Strobe in this early round, at least in appearance. Its division of functions and resources appears more inspired by Google than Apple, with icons that lead prospective vendors along the way, and that promote a vision of simplicity and straightforwardness.
Strobe tries to be much more than a listing service for folks to go download stuff. These days, users expect apps to be supported by the services that make them available. They’re not looking for the equivalent of apps vending machines.
Jolley tells us, “When we started Strobe, we spent a lot of time promoting our open source JavaScript framework SproutCore, which came out of Apple. We did that to educate people on the fact that they could build HTML5 apps for mobile. But what’s remarkable is, that has really shifted in the last three months. Now, we do almost no education on HTML5. There’s a huge amount of people who have decided they know how to build an HTML5 app, there’s enough tools out there, they can make this work. Now, where we physically engage people is [at the point where], ‘I’ve built the app, now what? I need to take this to market.’”
That said, Strobe does utilize a JavaScript framework, called Strobe.js. Its developers page says it “provides a single API that smooths out the limitations and inconsistencies of the different platforms, using our server environment behind the scenes where necessary.”
Most importantly, Strobe.js resolves the problem of scripting that applies to multiple domains simultaneously, leading to the kinds of cross-domain discrepancies that security tools presently associate with hijack attempts, and which newer browsers disallow. HTML5 developers will want their apps to include links to functionality from Facebook, Twitter, and other social services. These links seem simple enough, but their security protocols require logins and virtual sessions – which means the domains of these services’ URLs must be addressed somehow.

Strobe.js creates a level of indirection, letting apps use Strobe servers as proxies to authenticate themselves on social services and use their APIs, without having to build OAuth functionality directly into their apps, or to force users to log in separately. This is the core of the Strobe Social add-on, which is key to the company’s unique business model.
Unlike Apple, which takes as much as 30% commission on sales through its App Store, Strobe’s business model relies on how much and how often deployed apps use Strobe’s server-side API. “It works a lot like an analytics system, like Omniture,” explains Strobe’s Charles Jolley. “Every time you launch an app, it hits our server for an update to see if there’s a new version available. That’s an API call. If you turn on one of these add-ons to get the server to do social, that’s an API call. You buy packages from us based on API calls.”
The first 10,000 API calls placed per month on a developer’s account are free, as well as the first 10 GB of bandwidth on Strobe’s servers. That’s to give developers a leg up during the testing phase. Typically once apps are deployed, the bandwidth use will expand to a level worth charging for. Up to 1 million API calls per month, and 50 GB of bandwidth, carry a $19 monthly fee. API calls numbering up to 10 million per month with 250 GB of bandwidth, costs $95 monthly.

Forthcoming iterations of Strobe will give participants greater app storage, Jolley tells RWW, as well as the back-end software necessary to connect downloaders with the back-end clouds these apps will require.
“Today, your options for doing HTML5 are basically to build the app and roll everything yourself, or to launch on Strobe. Those are your two options,” says the CEO. “The fact is, there are people who can build and launch a great HTML5 app… But they have huge teams that have to know a lot about a wide array of technologies in order to make this happen. It’s definitely not something that your average one or two developers in a garage or a cube, trying to launch the Next Big Thing, are going to be able to do. That, to me, is the big difference with Strobe. Now, all you have to do is build your app, and we take care of everything else. Today, with HTML5, building your app is just the start.”
CORRECTION: An earlier draft of this story incorrectly stated that Charles Jolley had developed the NPR app while at Apple. Though Jolley is the co-developer of the current build with Strobe, the original SproutCast demo was created by independent developers looking to mirror the functionality of the native iPad app.
View full post on ReadWriteWeb
RKG (Rimm-Kaufman Group) Acquires SEO Leader AudetteMedia – San Francisco Chronicle (press release)
Aug 18th
|
RKG (Rimm-Kaufman Group) Acquires SEO Leader AudetteMedia
San Francisco Chronicle (press release) The addition of AudetteMedia adds a dedicated team of expert SEO strategists who have built a solid track record of success across a number of industry sectors. Adding AudetteMedia allows RKG to offer a complete suite of online marketing solutions to … |
View full post on SEO – Google News
Respected Tech Leader Jay Love Named CEO of Slingshot SEO – San Francisco Chronicle (press release)
Aug 8th
|
Respected Tech Leader Jay Love Named CEO of Slingshot SEO
San Francisco Chronicle (press release) Jay Love, one of the most respected technology entrepreneurs in Indiana, is returning to his home state to lead Slingshot SEO, the company dedicated to providing digital relevance for deserving brands. One of the founders of eTapestry and most recently … |
View full post on SEO – Google News