Posts tagged Gets

Seo In Guk gets up close and personal with 1000 fans during his first fan … – allkpop


allkpop
Seo In Guk gets up close and personal with 1000 fans during his first fan
allkpop
In addition, for the "Saranghae U" stage, Seo In Guk invited the winner of his fan event and gave her a back hug as he serenaded her, making both her and every fan in the audience squeal. He also talked about his upcoming tvN drama 'High School King' …

View full post on SEO – Google News

Seo In Guk gets up close and personal with 1000 fans during his first fan … – allkpop


allkpop
Seo In Guk gets up close and personal with 1000 fans during his first fan
allkpop
In addition, for the "Saranghae U" stage, Seo In Guk invited the winner of his fan event and gave her a back hug as he serenaded her, making both her and every fan in the audience squeal. He also talked about his upcoming tvN drama 'High School King' …

View full post on SEO – Google News

GitHub Gets Its Science On

There are a lot of reasons to use GitHub even if you’re not a software developer. For example, if you’re a scientist using the tool for collaborative research and data. 

In a Wednesday blog post, GitHub announced two new user interface updates to better accommodate the needs of researchers and scientists. 

“GitHub is being used today to build scientific software that’s helping find Earth-like planets in other solar systems, analyze DNA, and build open source rockets,” wrote Arfon Smith, leader of the GitHub Science Program. “Seeing these projects and all this momentum within academia has pushed us to think about how we can make GitHub a better tool for research.”

Until now, GitHub repositories couldn’t be cited—at least officially—in academic papers. That’s because they didn’t have Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) until now. A DOI is a unique numerical string that ties metadata and other information to an electronic document so it can be cited. 

The company worked with Mozilla Science Lab and two data archivers, Figshare and Zenodo, to make it possible to add a DOI to any repository. A new guide shows you how to do it. 

The other big change is that now scientists have the ability to make research accounts by tying an academic email address to a repository. The real benefit of a research account is that you can get a GitHub Education Discount, just like students and teachers do.

While it’s apparent that plenty of scientists use GitHub for development, these new changes might make GitHub a more welcoming place for scientists who are less computer savvy. Many people (often even those within GitHub itself) overlook the non-coding ways that GitHub makes a useful tool for collaboration, from editing papers to conducting research. 

At the very least, non-developers will have an easy, academia-friendly way to cite GitHub repositories in their papers.

Lead image by Flickr user Paris Buttfield-Addison, CC 2.0; science meme image courtesy of cheezburger.com

View full post on ReadWrite

Re-imagining Google: America’s Favorite Homepage Gets A Redesign By Letter Society Blog

Early last month, the design blog Letter Society posted a challenge asking its select group of designers to submit redesigns of Google.com. The site, which positions itself as a “collaborative and challenge based” blog, asked the designers to do a “reskinning” of the current…



Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

View full post on Search Engine Land: News & Info About SEO, PPC, SEM, Search Engines & Search Marketing

Windows XP Gets A Surprise Patch From Microsoft

Oh, how Microsoft must wish it could quit Windows XP.

The software giant officially stopped supporting its 13-year-old operating system in April, technically leaving its legions of hangers-on stranded with no hope of future security updates. But even Microsoft couldn’t leave users in the lurch in the face of an Internet Explorer vulnerability considered so harmful that the U.S. government warned users to avoid the browser until it was fixed.

So Microsoft has issued an emergency patch to Windows XP. Both IE and Windows XP received what Microsoft calls critical out-of-band security updates today, May 1, and all users that still have automatic updates enabled will get it straight away and don’t have to take any action.

Windows XP and IE users who are updating manually should do so immediately, a Microsoft Security Response Center blog post urges. Windows Update will download the patch automatically; you can also find manual updates on the Microsoft Update website.

Windows XP users shouldn’t take hope that Microsoft might actually reconsider extending XP support. Adrienne Hall, Microsoft general manager of trustworthy computing, made a point of noting that XP users should update to Windows 7 or 8, and IE users should update to version 11, in a post on Microsoft’s official blog.

Image of Terry Myerson, executive VP of the Microsoft operating-systems group, by Owen Thomas for ReadWrite

View full post on ReadWrite

Bing Ads Gets Friendlier To Big Accounts: Now See Up To 50,000 Keywords In Web UI

Managing big accounts in the Bing Ads web UI has long had its challenges. The team is starting to change that.  Now, at the account, campaign and ad group level, paid search managers can now see performance data on as many as 50,000 keywords in the web interface of Bing Ads. The results used to…



Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

View full post on Search Engine Land: News & Info About SEO, PPC, SEM, Search Engines & Search Marketing

Facebook Finally Gets Serious About Privacy

Facebook is finally getting serious about privacy. At its F8 developer conference in San Francisco Wednesday, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced two new updates to Facebook Login that center around user privacy.

You’ll now be able to use Facebook Login anonymously, meaning you can log into a mobile application using your Facebook account—but the application won’t know any personal information about you. 

“It’s an experience that’s synced without an app knowing who you are,” Zuckerberg said. “If you want, you can always sign in with your real identity once you’re comfortable sharing your information.”

Facebook has grappled with privacy issues in the past. And Zuckerberg has notoriously been chilly about the idea about anonymity online. The Facebook experience is, after all, all about your real identity. But with anonymous login, Facebook is embracing the concerns of users and finally offering a new option for people that aren’t comfortable sharing their true identity with applications that don’t need to know your real name, location, or Facebook Likes in order to operate. 

For users that are privacy conscious but still want to use their real identity to log into third-party applications, Facebook rolled out editable permissions at F8 as well. Now, when you log into an application, you can choose which personal information to share line by line. 

“We know people are scared of pressing this blue [Facebook Login] button,” Zuckerberg said, admitting users are nervous about sharing all their personal information with third-party apps. “We don’t want anyone to be surprised how they’re sharing on Facebook.”

Some applications, like the ridesharing application Lyft, will likely require people to provide identifying personal information like their name and picture, but now you’ll be able to give apps only the information they require, and nothing else. 

While the new Facebook features are a great move for protecting user privacy, it’s still unclear whether Facebook knows which apps you’re using even if you log in anonymously. For now, though, Facebook will be satisfied by gaining the favor of privacy pundits that are nervous about how applications access and use their personal information. 

View full post on ReadWrite

Bing: New York Sleeps Late; SF Gets Up The Earliest

Microsoft Bing posted data on the earliest risers by city based on Bing usage data. Bing said they “thought it would be interesting to look at Bing usage as a proxy for when people get online, start work or otherwise wake up.” The earliest city to rise is San Francisco, reaching 50% of…



Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

View full post on Search Engine Land: News & Info About SEO, PPC, SEM, Search Engines & Search Marketing

Post-Heartbleed, Open Source Gets A New Security Attitude

The Internet may not agree on much. But if there’s one idea its citizens can get behind, it’s that nothing like the Heartbleed bug should ever happen again.

And so the Linux Foundation—backed by Google, Amazon Web Services, Cisco, Dell, Facebook, Fujitsu, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, NetApp, Rackspace and VMware—is launching a new Core Infrastructure Initiative that aims to bolster open-source projects critical to the Internet and other crucial information systems. Many such projects are starved for funding and development resources, despite their importance to Internet communications and commerce. 

The initiative is brand new—the steering committee hasn’t even had a meeting yet—so there aren’t many details as to how this will all work at the moment. 

It’s hard not to applaud such an important development, even if the promise seems somewhat vague. Of course, the details do matter; no one wants to lull a post-Heartbleed world into a false sense of security. The Heartbleed bug tarnished the image of open source. Another serious failure could erode support for it.

That would be a shame—mostly because, despite the hard knock it’s taken from Heartbleed, open-source software really is more solid than proprietary code.

Heartbleed: The Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction

One of the biggest arguments in favor of open source—which typically depends on volunteers to add and refine programs and tools—is that projects with many eyes on them are less prone to serious bugs.

Often enough, that’s exactly how it works out. A recent report from software-testing outfit Coverity found that the quality of open-source code surpassed that of proprietary software. Shocked? You shouldn’t be. Popular open-source projects can have hundreds or thousands of developers contributing and reviewing code, while in-house corporate teams are usually far smaller and frequently hobbled by strict confidentiality to boot.

Unfortunately, not all open-source projects work like that. OpenSSL—yes, the communications-security protocol that fell prey to Heartbleed—was one such project. 

This potentially huge security hole started out as a mistake made by a single developer, a German researcher named Robin Seggelmann. Normally, revised code gets checked before going out, and his work on OpenSSL’s “heartbeat” extension did go through a review—by a security expert named Stephen Henson. Who also missed the error.

So Heartbleed started with two people—but even involving the entire OpenSSL team might not have helped much. There are only two other people listed on that core team, and just a handful more to flesh out the development team. What’s more, this crucial but non-commercial project makes do on just $2,000 in annual donations.

If this were a fictional premise, no one would believe it. A critical security project, limping along on a couple of thousand dollars a year, winds up in the hands of two people, whose apparently innocent mistake goes on to propagate all over the Internet.

The Core Infrastructure Initiative aims to ensure that OpenSSL and other major open-source projects don’t let serious bugs lie around unfixed. Its plan: Fill in the gaps with funding and staff.

Making Open Source Whole


 

Security for the Internet at large was practically built on OpenSSL. And yet, the open-source software never went though a meticulous security audit. There wasn’t money or manpower for one.

From the Linux Foundation’s perspective, that’s unacceptable. 

The Linux operating system may be the world’s leading open-source success story. Volunteers across the globe flock to Linus Torvalds’ software, contributing changes at a rate of nine per hour. That amounts to millions of lines of code that improve or fix various aspects of the operating system each year. And it draws roughly half a million dollars in annual donations. Some of those funds go to Torvalds, Linux’s creator, so he can dedicate himself to development full-time. 

The Linux Foundation likewise sees its Core Infrastructure Initiative becoming a benefactor of sorts to key software projects, one that can direct funds to hire full-time developers, arrange for code review and testing, and handle other issues so that major vulnerabilities like Heartbleed don’t slip through the cracks again. 

The first candidate is—you guessed it—OpenSSL. According to the press announcement, the project “could receive fellowship funding for key developers as well as other resources to assist the project in improving its security, enabling outside reviews, and improving responsiveness to patch requests.”

But OpenSSL is just the beginning. “I think in this crisis, the idea was to create something good out of it,” Jim Zemlin, executive director of the Linux Foundation, told me. “To be proactive about pooling resources, looking at projects that are underfunded, that are important, and providing some resources to them.”

Sounds like a great idea. Not only does the move address specific concerns about open-source development—like minimal staffing and non-existent funding—it would also reinforce the integrity of critical systems that hinge on it. 

It’s an ambitious plan, one that came together at lightning speed. Chris DiBona, Google’s director of engineering of open source, told me Zemlin called him just last week with the idea.

“We [at Google] were doing that whole, ‘Okay, we’ve been helping out open source. Are we helping them enough?’” said DiBona, who reminded me that it was a security engineer at his company who first found the Heartbleed bug. “And then Jim calls up and says, ‘You know, we should just figure out how to head this off at the pass before the next time this happens.’ And it’s like, ‘Yeah, you’re right. Let’s just do it. We’ll try to find a way’.” 

Over the next few days, other companies immediately jumped at the chance to help. “I think it’s a historical moment, when you have a collective response to what was a collective problem,” said Zemlin.

The Core Infrastructure initiative is still gaining new supporters. Just a few hours before I spoke with Zemlin and DiBona Wednesday evening, another backer signed on. As of this writing, 12 companies had officially joined the fold. Each is donating $100,000 per year for a minimum of three years, for a total of $3.6 million.

Those Pesky Details

Eventually, the details will have to be ironed out. There will be a steering committee made up of backers, experts, academics and members of the open-source community. And when they meet, they will need to make some big decisions—like determining criteria for deciding which projects get funded (or not). The committee will also need to figure out “what we consider to be a minimum level of security,” said DiBona. 

Zemlin is careful to note that he doesn’t want to fall into the trap of over-regulating or dictating so much that it would alter the spirit of open-source development. “Everyone who’s participating will respect the community norms for the various projects,” he said. “We don’t want to mess up the good things that happen by being prescriptive.”

He and his initiative will draw from the Linux Foundation’s experience powering Linux development. “We have 10 years of history showing that you can support these projects and certainly not slow down their development,” Zemlin said. And indeed, if anyone can figure it out, it could be him and his foundation. 

But it may not be easy, keeping the creative, free-spirited nature of open source alive in the face of serious core infrastructure concerns. Critical systems usually demand organization and regimented practices. And sometimes, to keep the heart from bleeding, a prescription might just be in order. 

Images courtesy of Flickr users John (feature image), Bennett (lonely developer), Chris Potter (money life preserver), Alex Gorzen (Linux Easter Egg).

View full post on ReadWrite

Go to Top
Copyright © 1992-2014, DC2NET All rights reserved