Posts tagged Front
In Front Media’s Tips on How to Survive Google’s 2012 Updates in 2013 – San Francisco Chronicle
Nov 29th
![]() Examiner.com |
In Front Media's Tips on How to Survive Google's 2012 Updates in 2013
San Francisco Chronicle For a Web Design company, an SEO Service or even a website owner, surviving the algorithm updates Google has included over the last year, has been a full-time job plus overtime, trying to keep up with all the algorithm changes. In Front Media knows … Small Businesses can get a free 'SEO Survival Guide' 5 Easy Ways to Improve Your SEO Before the New Year The Beginner's Guide to Keyword Research Using Free Tools |
View full post on SEO – Google News
Front Page PR Unveils $100 per Page SEO Service for Small Businesses; Digital – KRGV
Oct 8th
|
Front Page PR Unveils $100 per Page SEO Service for Small Businesses; Digital
KRGV AUSTIN, TX — (Marketwire) 10/08/12 — Front Page PR (www.frontpagepr.com) announced an affordable search engine optimization (SEO) marketing package to help small businesses make the second most important investment after building a preliminary … |
View full post on SEO – Google News
Connecticut SEO Firm Takes NY Lawyer to Google Front Page in 1 Month – PRunderground
Sep 26th
![]() PRunderground |
Connecticut SEO Firm Takes NY Lawyer to Google Front Page in 1 Month
PRunderground Connecticut SEO Firm Takes NY Lawyer to Google Front Page in 1 Month. Industry: Web Design. Connecticut SEO Kim Ronemus Design propels its client, a Manhattan attorney, from page 15 to page 1 in Google search results in under one month. SEO.org.uk reviews the role of Author Rank in SEO |
View full post on SEO – Google News
How Dollar Shave Club Got Their Sales Pitch in Front of 5 Million+ People
Jul 20th
If you can stand out by creating great content and essentially pitch to more than 5 million potential customers with a single online video posted to YouTube, surely that’s far more efficient than any other sales activity is likely to be.
View full post on Search Engine Watch – Latest
Retailer’s Tax on IE 7 Users Opens New Front in Browser Wars
Jun 18th
When Australian retailer Kogan.com enacted a “tax” on customers using Internet Explorer 7 last week, it may not have been trying to become the poster child for worldwide Web-developer frustration with Microsoft browsers. But the stunt seems to have tapped into a seething undercurrent of animosity for Internet Explorer that could bring new combatants to the ongoing browser wars.
What Is an IE Tax?
Russell Kogan, owner of the Kogan.com site, announced the 6.8% surcharge Wednesday for any goods purchased on Kogan.com by users still surfing with IE 7. Kogan’s admonishment was tongue-in-cheek, but his motivation was based on serious economic considerations.
“The way we’ve been able to keep our prices so low is by using technology to make our business efficient and streamlined. One of the things stopping that is our Web team having to spend a lot of time making our new website look normal on IE7,” Kogan wrote.
Kogan’s post, and the message dialog that pops up for users who arrive at the site using IE 7, make it very clear that all that’s needed to avoid the “tax” is a simple upgrade to a newer version of IE – or another browser altogether. But his call for even lighthearted punitive action is underpinned by a very real issue that seems to be gaining traction within Web development circles: a deep and abiding loathing for any version of Internet Explorer.
Why Developers Won’t Support IE Anymore
This hatred of IE is starting to manifest in wholesale rejection of the browser, as many developers begin to refuse to support IE features on their websites. In most cases, the reason is the time and effort that has to be invested to properly deal with IE’s nonstandard ways of rendering Web pages.
Greek Web developer Lea Verou eloquently described the magnitude of the problem last Fall:
“If we choose to make a website pixel-perfect in Internet Explorer 6 to 8, then we are doing up to 100% more work. No matter how many frameworks, polyfills and other scripts we use to ease our pain, we will always be doing at least 30% more work for those browsers,” Verou wrote. “How many of us actually charge 30-100% extra for this work?”
Verou’s solution to the problem of dealing with IE Web development is to actually tack on a surcharge of her own.
IE 7 Costs Developers Money
“I don’t do much client work these days, but every time I’ve taken on a client project in my career, I’ve always presented options for browser support to my client. They want pixel perfection in IE 7? It will cost them more. They want IE 6 support? It will cost double,” she wrote.
Some Web developers have gone even further. Toronto-based startup 4ormat outright refuses to let any IE user sign in to their site. Co-founder Tyler Rooney outlined the online portfolio service provider’s 2008 decision to block IE this past April, citing Verou’s earlier estimates of the effort needed for IE Web development:
“Within a week it was painfully obvious that for every great idea we came up with we had to create equally terrible hacks to support IE7 or even IE8. Supporting variants of IE can easily increase design work by 30% to 100%, but complex features can easily double (or even triple) development time. It doesn’t take many developer salaries before this ‘IE tax’ can cost you well over $100,000,” Rooney wrote this spring.
Not unexpectedly, Rooney was generally positive about Kogan.com’s IE “tax.”
“I think Kogan’s decision is definitely a novel way to educate their customers about the perils of using an out-of-date Web browser,” Rooney commented in an email today.
“When we decided to not support any version of Internet Explorer back in 2008 it was a simple business decision. Not supporting browsers which our target market weren’t even using enabled us to ship a better product in a shorter period of time,” Rooney added. “Kogan mentioned that he doesn’t expect anyone to pay the tax so I’d suspect that their decision won’t have much of an effect on revenue. Kogan probably also came to the same conclusion that we did about all the other benefits that come with not supporting out-of-date browsers: huge productivity gains, shorter release cycles and happier employees.”
Good News for Chrome and Firefox?
If this sentiment against IE continues to gain traction, Microsoft could be facing a sharper migration away from one of its flagship products to Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox.
It’s clear that the browser wars of old are taking a very new turn: Web developers are no longer rolling over and letting a single vendor dictate how websites are put together. Real standards, not just ones for which Microsoft lobbies, seem to be the order of the day.
And if developers aren’t satisfied with a browser, they are now unafraid to fight back.
View full post on ReadWriteWeb
YouTube Redesign Brings Google+ To Facebook’s Front Door
Dec 1st
The YouTube redesign we got a sneak peak into last month is now going live for all users. It has been reborn as a social and customizable media site, letting users customize their lists of channels right on the front page, as well as share to Google+ and Facebook.
It might be surprising to see Facebook integration so prominently on YouTube, with Google+ is trying to make a name for itself, but think of it this way: Facebook is huge. YouTube is huge. Google+ is not yet huge. What better way for Google to introduce Facebook users to Google+?
![]()
The new YouTube got a lot of design attention. No more simple boxes on a white background. Google wants lots of eyeballs on these pages. It is realigning its media relationships and striking new content deals around the world. YouTube has been mainstream for years, but the new YouTube will redefine the term “mainstream media.” Disney movies, music videos, Rebecca Black and cute puppies all make YouTube what it is, and the new design encourages users to watch and share all of it.
Read more about the redesign on the YouTube blog.
View full post on ReadWriteWeb
Google Front & Center at SOPA Piracy Hearing
Nov 17th
You’d think Google wouldn’t want to antagonize another branch of the federal government. But yesterday Google led the protests against the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) being discussed at the House Judiciary Committee.
“Right from the start, the…
View full post on Search Engine Watch – Latest
Progress on the Dedupe Front
Oct 20th
This month saw new dedupe backup appliances from Greenbytes and Quantum that are VM-aware and reminded me that there is a lot going on in this particular market. Dedupe means avoiding making multiple backups of the same file, even if that file is found across different VMs or different users. Let’s look at some of the recent announcements and also point to places that we have covered dedupe techs in the recent past if you want to learn more about the subject.
John Cronin, a senior technical product manager for the storage and availability management group at Symantec, was one of our participants in our live text chat earlier this week. He mentioned that
“space optimized snapshots can use storage more efficiently. For example, in a virtual desktop environment most of the OS images have largely the same bits. If we store 1000 desktop images, we can save a lot of space if we only use one copy of the things that are the same and then store only the differences.”
Speaking of our chat series, in the first one that we held last month, we dived a bit deeper into dedupe, and you can replay the chat here.
So the major product announcements this month include the Greenbytes HA-3000 dedupe appliance and the Quantum DXi4601 dedupe appliance, which costs $21,500 for a 4 TB system, which is low for the kind of functionality it offers. It can also scale on demand from 4 TB up to 12 TB of usable capacity by simply activating the appropriate licensing key. Quantum claims it has twice the dedupe performance of competitors in its class at half the price. Last month, we even saw the beginnings of offering dedupe on actual silicon, which will speed up the process even further.
There are many backup technologies that are available that include dedupe as part of their feature set, and we review the major ones here and in a review of Acronis Backup here in stories we wrote over the summer.
View full post on ReadWriteWeb


