Posts tagged Fight
The convoluted saga of Google News in Germany took another turn on Friday when regulators declined to pursue an antitrust claim against the company brought by “VG Media,” a consortium of German publishers including publishing giant Axel Springer. Reuters covered the decision but…
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
In lieu of enforceable net neutrality rules—which don’t yet exist—the Internet Association posted on Monday a handy infographic on what such rules about managing Internet traffic might look like on paper. At least in the opinion of the Internet Association, anyway.
It’s part of the Silicon Valley lobby group’s campaign to make the FCC issue rules that will keep cable companies and mobile providers from interfering with network traffic. Facebook, Google, Amazon, eBay, Netflix and the other three dozen Web companies which make up the Internet Association all have a vested interest in ensuring the FCC sees things their way.
So expect to see lots more things like infographics in the coming weeks, as the FCC collects public comments on its latest Net Neutrality proposal.
In January, a federal appeals court struck down the FCC’s “Open Internet Order” to prevent ISPs from providing some content faster than others, ruling that the FCC did not have the authority to enforce such rules. The decision was seen a blow to both Internet freedom and dangerous government regulation—depending on who you ask. As the Electronic Frontier Foundation noted at the time, “there is a lot of truth to both of these claims“:
Violations of network neutrality are a real and serious problem: in recent years we have seen dozens of ISPs in the U.S. and around the world interfere with and discriminate against traffic on their networks in ways that threaten the innovative fabric of the Internet. At the same time, we’ve long doubted that the FCC had the authority to issue the Open Internet rules in the first place, and we worried that the rules would lead to the FCC gaining broad control over the Internet. The FCC in particular has a poor track record of regulating our communications services. We are not confident that Internet users can trust the FCC, or any government agency, with open-ended regulatory authority of the Internet.
The FCC is now open for public comments on its latest net neutrality proposal, which will prevent ISPs from blocking user access to websites and applications, but allow them to charge content providers for faster Internet speeds as long as those deals are “commercially reasonable.”
On Monday, the Internet Association filed its own comments with the FCC. “Segregation of the Internet into fast lanes and slow lanes will distort the market, discourage innovation and harm Internet users,” Michael Beckerman, the association’s president and CEO, said in a statement. “The FCC must act to create strong, enforceable net neutrality rules and apply them equally to both wireless and wireline providers.”
In its press release, as well as the handy infographic (featuring hip hat tips such as “Futurama’s” Philip J. Fry and cats Grumpy and Nyan), the Internet Assocation encourages Internet users to action, and breaks down its suggestion for “Enforceable Net Neutrality Rules,” which seem to put the customer first:
As the EFF pointed out in January, net neutrality is far more complicated:
Internet users should be wary of any suggestion that there is an easy path to network neutrality. It’s a hard problem, and building solutions to resolve it is going to remain challenging. But here is one guiding principle: any effort to defend Net Neutrality should use the lightest touch possible, encourage a competitive marketplace, and focus on preventing discriminatory conduct by ISPs, rather than issuing broad mandatory obligations that are vulnerable to perverse consequences and likely to be outdated as soon as they take effect.
There is one thing to keep in mind when reviewing that handy Internet Association infographic that seems to put you, the potentially government representative-contacting individual, first. Take another look at Sen. Al Franken’s 2012 antitrust speech to the American Bar Association, in which he says of Internet giants such as Google and Facebook, “[Y]ou are not their client. You are their product.”
It will likely be a long time before we see anything resembling “enforceable net neutrality rules” exist on something more than the ones and zeros of the Internet Association’s infographic. If you feel you can’t wait, however, why not print it out? Then it will exist on paper paper, thus moving such rules one step closer to becoming a simulacrum of something real … just like the Internet!
View full post on ReadWrite
With New Product, ReachLocal Looks to Turn the Corner on SEO
ReachLocal Among the many cutting-edge innovations in local marketing, search engine optimization is getting to be old hat; in fact, its age and relative familiarity can result in a widespread lack of interest and dedication to using SEO as a primary …
View full post on SEO – Google News
Plantation holiday house isn't brightest bulb in TV show's 'Christmas Light Fight'
December 23, 2013|By Lisa J. Huriash and Tonya Alanez, Sun Sentinel, By Lisa J. Huriash and Tonya Alanez, Sun Sentinel. PLANTATION — Judges in an ABC reality show praised the “amusement-park” quality of their “spectacular, over-the-top” …
View full post on SEO – Google News
Legal fight clubs compete in various championship matches around the globe. Among the fighters the man with the best overall record for active fighters is none other than Jason Reinhardt with 17 wins and not a single loss, followed closely by Phillip Miller and Diego Sanchez with 16 wins. Well let’s take a look at the worst losses statistics too; it’s headed by Matt Albright with only a single win and seventeen losses, followed by Mike Lindquist. Among the highest or most KO or TKO wins of the fight clubs fighters at the top list is Travis Fulton with a total of 52 wins, trailing by Iqor Voychanchyn and Gilbert Yvel with 24 wins. These legal fight clubs competitions usually have submission matches; as such for the submission wins, the highest score among the fighters is Travis Fulton with 116 points, followed by Jeremy Horn and Dan Severn. Fight clubs uses various tactics to bring their opponents into submission such as choking, guillotine choke, knee submission and such. The champion Travis Fulton has the highest score for the choke wins with 42 wins, for the guillotine choke its Travis Fulton again. However for the highest decision wins, it goes to Keiichiro Vamamiya with 20 wins, followed by Dave Menne. As expected, the fight club fighters competing in the most promotion fighter is again Travis Fulton with a total of 79 matches followed by Shannon Ritch and Dan Severn. After having noted down all these wins and losses statistics of the fight club fighters, let’s check out the teams with the best records. According to the latest available record, at the top is the Toshido Fighting Arts fight club with 24 wins and just 3 losses, their overall ratio around 0. 89. Second place is taken by Jackson’s Submission Fighting with 90 wins and 16 losses, overall ratio of 0. 85. The tenth place is taken by the Five Rings Dojo, fifteenth place by Team Velocity. Amongst the last ones are the Kz Factory, Asher Combat Academy, Freelance etc. These fight clubs participate in championship fights every now and then, which are all under close supervision of the authorities unlike the underground fight clubs. Anyhow, the organization with the most matches is headed by Shooto with 1325 matches, Pancrase with 1156 matches, followed by King of the cage, Rage in the cage etc. Well among the current super heavyweight rankings, the fight club fighter of above 265lbs+ Ron Waterman (WFA) is at the top, followed by Sylvester Terkay (K1). For those between 205-265lbs, at the top rank is Mirko Filipovic (PRIDE), followed by Antonio Rodrigo Noqueira (PRIDE). All these fights are regulated properly and fighters compete according to the weight difference.